🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a disagreement between a defunct facility, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to put them down unless the government funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior suggest they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a position that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and quirks in their dispositions. She formed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale chose me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I view connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say reflects the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and move about with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far superior health care and around the clock supervision than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in the spring following the demise of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park believed details of the incident were leaked to the press and she was fired not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “immense manpower”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister rejected a bid to export the whales to China.

“Allowing the request would have meant a ongoing situation in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that belugas are meant for the ocean, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would continue the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has been contentious. The prospective facility, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Advocates remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the idea of a refuge indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable plan in the short term.

An official, leader of the plan, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the health of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|